Vol.4 No.1 2011

34/78

Research paper : Formation of research strategy and synthetic research evaluation based on the strategy (N. Kobayashi et al.)−31−Synthesiology - English edition Vol.4 No.1 (2011) U.S. Department of Energy website: http://www.energy.gov/hubs/index.htmEuropean Commission FP7 website: http://ec.europa.eu/research/fp7/index_en.cfmhttp://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/sinseichousenryaku/sinseichou01.pdf (in Japanese)J. A. McLaughlin and G. B. Jordan: Logic models: A tool for telling your programs performance story, Evaluation and Program Planning, 22 (1), 65-72 (1999). G. B. Jordan: A theory-based logic model for innovation policy and evaluation, Research Evaluation, 19 (4), 263-273 (2010).R. Hirasawa: Hyoka kenkyu no sokatsu (Summary of evaluation research), Material for the 3rd MEXT Mutual Training Session for Policy Evaluation FY 2008 (2009) (in Japanese).AIST Evaluation Department: Heisei 17 Nendo Kenkyu Yunitto Hyoka Hokokusho (FY 2005 Research Unit Evaluation Report) (2005) (in Japanese).H. Yoshikawa: Honkaku Kenkyu (Full Research), The University of Tokyo Press (2009) (in Japanese).H. Yoshikawa: A journal for Type 2 Basic Research, Synthesiology, 1(1), 1-6 (2008).M. Koshiba: Nyutorino Tentai Butsurigaku Nyumon (Introduction to Neutrino Astrophysics), Kodansha (2002) (in Japanese).[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]ReferencesTerm 4.Term 5.Term 6.Basic research, applied research, experimental development: According to the definition of OECD, basic research is an “experimental or theoretical work undertaken primarily to acquire new knowledge of the underlying foundations of phenomena and observable facts, without any particular application or use in view”. Applied research is an “original investigation undertaken in order to acquire new knowledge. It is, however, directed primarily towards a specific practical aim or objective”. Experimental development is the “systematic work, drawing on existing knowledge gained from research and/or practical experience, that is directed to producing new materials, products or devices; to installing new processes, systems and services; or to improving substantially those already produced or installed”[15].ROAMEF: Acronym for R (rationale), O (objective), A (appraisal), M (monitoring), E (evaluation), and F (feedback, or review of the cycle)[16].PDCA cycle: A kind of management cycle proposed in the 1950s by Walter A. Shewhart and W. Edwards Deming (U.S.A). It is an acronym for P (plan), D (do), C (check), and A (act). When one cycle is completed, the final “act” is linked to the “plan” of the next cycle so the project will improve spirally. The PDCA cycle can be implemented for a small group or for the entire organization. Ideally, the individual PDCA cycles should link to the higher PDCA cycle[24][28].Y. Yonemori: Pasu No Kigogaku (Symbology of Peirce), Keiso Shobo, 173-200 (1981) (in Japanese).H. Yoshikawa: Kagakusha No Atarashii Yakuwari (New Role of Scientists), Iwanami Shoten, 13-29 (2002) (in Japanese).Y. Yonemori: Abudakushon (Abduction), Keiso Shobo (2007) (in Japanese).H. Ishikawa: Technologies for all-optical path routing toward huge capacity and low power consumption networks, International Symposium on Ultra-high Capacity Optical Communication and Related Optical Signal Processing and Devices, Sept. (2010). OECD Frascati Manual, Sixth edition (2002).R. Ohtani: “Science for society” and evaluation of research and technology development, Synthesiology, 3 (1), 264-274 (2010) (English version available).N. Kobayashi: Sangyo gijutsu sogo kenkyusho ni okeru autokamu e no shiten karano senryaku teki kenkyu hyoka to sangakukan renkei e no kadai (Strategic Research Evaluation in AIST from the Perspective of Outcomes and Its Critical Issues for Industry-Academia Collaboration), Journal of the Japan Society for Intellectual Production, 4 (1), 14-24 (2007) (in Japanese).AIST: Dai Niki Kenkyu Senryaku (Second Term Research Strategy), (2005) (2006) (2007) (2008) (2009) (in Japanese).AIST: Sansoken No Keiei To Senryaku (Management and Strategy at AIST) (2005) (in Japanese).AIST Evaluation Department: Heisei 20 Nendo Kenkyu Yunitto Hyoka Hokokusho (FY 2008 Research Unit Evaluation Report) (2008) (in Japanese).O. Nakamura, S. Ito, K. Matsuzaki, H. Adachi, T. Kado and S. Oka: Using roadmaps for evaluating strategic research and development: Lessons from Japan’s Institute for Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Research Evaluation, 17 (4), 265-271 (2008).AIST Evaluation Department: Dai Niki Chuki Mokuhyou Kikan Kenkyu Yunitto Hyoka Hokokusho (Second Medium Term Target Period Research Unit Evaluation Report) (2010) (in Japanese).O. Nakamura: Imakoso senryaku teki puranningu ni motozuku kenkyu kaihatsu o!- rojikku moderu no katsuyo- (R&D based on strategic planning now! – Use of logic model), Letter from Industrial Technology Center of Nagasaki Challenge, 145, Prefatory Note (2009) (in Japanese).O. Nakamura: R&D evaluation, Kenkyujo Keiei (Research Institute Management) (K. Kurata and K. Kawajiri, eds.), Kogyo Chosakai Publishing, 311-336 (2010) (in Japanese).Science and Technology Promotion Bureau, Nagasaki Prefecture: http://www.pref.nagasaki.jp/kagaku/ (in Japanese)O. Nakamura, S. Iwai, K. Nishimura and N. Inada: Chiiki kasseika o mezashita nagasaki ban kagaku gijutsu shinko no jitsurei to kosatsu (Case of Nagasaki’s promotion of science and technology for regional vitalization), Collection of Lectures, 24th Annual Academic Conference, The Japan Society for Science Policy and Research Management, 442-445 (2009) (in Japanese).Ceramic Research Center of Nagasaki: http://www.pref.nagasaki.jp/yogyo/index.php (in Japanese)O. Nakamura, O. Nakamura, M. Takagi, T. Sawada, S. Kosaka, M. Koyanagi, I. Matsunaga, K. Mizuno and N. Kobayashi: Strategic evaluation of research and development in a Japan’s public research institute, New Directions for Evaluation, 118, 25-36 (2008).[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]

※このページを正しく表示するにはFlashPlayer9以上が必要です