As a result of the surveys, a 65 km-long fault was confirmed to have appeared on the ground surface (Figure 1) and researchers were able for the first time to get a picture of the entire fault that caused the earthquake.
The main part of the fault, an approximate 50 km-long section running from the NW to the central part of the fault strand, showed major displacement that was dominated by reverse fault components. Their measurements show maximum vertical displacement to be approximately 5.5 m (the NE side-up), and maximum net displacement to be approximately 9 m including a horizontal component. In addition, at several survey sites minor right-lateral slip components were identified. It is also noted that in the main fault section between the NW and central strands, there was discontinuity and bending of the fault line.
Along the SE strand, the continuity of the surface faulting was unclear. Only at two locations in a mountains fault ruptures were found to be occurring with small amount of right-lateral displacement of not more than a few dozen centimeters.
Judging from the distribution of the newly discovered surface fault, it appears that the earthquake occurred when a 20-30 km-long fault segment in each of the NW and central areas ruptured with major displacement. Then, somewhat small-scale displacement in the SW area may also have led to some rupturing.
The main part of the surface fault responsible for the earthquake appeared along an active fault that had previously been known to exist (Nakata et al., 1991; Tanaka and Kumahara, 2005 and 2006). In addition, the distribution and amount of displacement of the identified surface fault roughly corresponded to the those of crustal movements during the earthquake analyzed from satellite observations, as well as to the under-ground rupture process that was analyzed from seismic waves.
Areas where damage was especially severe, such as in the town of Balakot and the northern hamlets of Muzaffarabad, were either just on the surface fault, or very close to it. The rate of house collapse tended to be greater near the fault than in surrounding areas. These findings suggest that ground deformation resulting from fault displacement caused particularly severe damage, and that ground shaking was especially intense near the fault.