| As information and communication technologies advance, the image media industries have achieved an outstanding growth, while biological impacts of screen image are being brought into questions worldwide. A lot of trouble cases have been reported in the past: in 1993, three persons watching a TV commercial were taken with PSE in the United Kingdom; in 1997, about 700 children watching a TV animation in Japan received medical treatment at a clinic because of PSE (so-called POKEMON incident); in July 2003, 36 out of about 300 junior-high students experienced motion sickness in Japan, while watching a self-produced movie in a class lesson, and were sent to a hospital.
Besides these cases in official reports, it has been widely whispered that some specific movies tend to cause motion sickness, and that eye fatigue occurs very often while watching 3D screen image. The further progress in image technology is expected to increase opportunities of viewing action scenes on wide screens and at high definition at home. In the present state of affairs, where various types of screen image, such as TV games, animation films and action movies, are invading general households, it is urgently needed to establish a norm for safety assessment of screen images as quickly as possible.
Under such circumstances, the standardization of safety assessment for screen image has been addressed for the purpose of PSE prevention. In the UK, the Independent Television Commission (ITC), a commercial TV broadcasters association, announced a guideline in 1994 on the safety of screen image, following the PSE incident in 1993.
The National Association of Commercial Broadcasters in Japan (NAB) established a Guideline on Animation and Other Imaging Techniques in 1998. Furthermore, the safety of screen image came up for discussion at the Radiocommunication Sector of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU-R) in September 2001, and a new recommendation was drafted based on the UKs ITC guideline in March 2003. The standardization of safety evaluation method in view of PSE prevention, which is currently under way, is to be extended in the future to the creation of a comprehensive criterion covering different imaging media other than TV broadcast.
On the other hand, the standardizing efforts for safety assessment of screen image have been made very little from a viewpoint of preventing motion sickness and 3D image-induced eye fatigue. It is said that a risk of potential PSE onset takes one in 4,000 persons (0.025%), while people apt to suffer from motion sickness is figured to be 10% or so at the least, on the basis of findings on the carsickness and those of motion sickness reported in Japan this July. It seems to be in pressing need to formulate a standard for safety assessment related to screen image, for the sake of people to be affected by motion sickness and 3D image-caused eye fatigue, who take a much greater proportion of the population than PSE patients.
|