National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)
Research resultsPublications > AIST TODAY > 2008-No.28
AIST TODAYNo.28 Spring 2008 [ PDF:4.5MB ]


Global Warming
Mitigation Technology and its Assessment

Feature

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Photovoltaic Power Generation

Increasing installation of photovoltaic power generation system

There is a growing expectation for clean and inexhaustible solar energy as a renewable energy source indispensable for sustainable society and for preventing global warming. Photovoltaic power generation above all is a system which converts solar energy directly to electricity and, as it has no moving part like a turbine, its maintenance is easy and it can be applied in various scales and forms from pocket calculators to large-scale power plants.

Ever since the Sunshine Project which started in 1974 as a long-term national project after the first oil crisis, research and development efforts through industry-government-academia cooperation and governmental promotion policies effectively resulted in reducing the cost, and there has been rapid increase in production and installation in recent years. As can be seen in Fig. 1, our country is the largest producing country of solar cells in the world.

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Progress in world solar cell production

Life cycle assessment

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Production processes of polycrystalline silicon solar cell

Although photovoltaic power generation system is an effective energy source in preventing global warming, a certain amount of energy is needed in manufacturing system components like photovoltaic cells and inverters, and naturally carbon dioxide (CO2) is emitted in the process. The time needed to recover input energy and to reduce CO2 emission during production is called energy payback time (EPT), and CO2 payback time (CO2PT) respectively. If these payback times are not sufficiently short compared to the life time of the system, it does not make sense at all as an energy producing technology. Life cycle assessment (LCA) which analyzes and evaluates these payback times are indispensably important in assessing the energy technology.

In fig.2 is shown the production process of polycrystalline silicon solar cells. In order to make accurate assessment of the input energy and the CO2 emission in production, it is necessary to thoroughly investigate the input materials and to sum up the energy needed for fabrication at each process.

The payback time of photovoltaic power generation system is calculated from the ratio of the production energy and CO2 emission at production of all system components like solar cells, and the annual electricity production and CO2 reduction. As the former gradually decreases through development of new solar cells, improvement of production technology and expansion of production scale, and the latter increases along with improvement in conversion efficiency and efficient usage of the system, the payback time of photovoltaic power generation system, which is still in the middle of technological innovation, is rapidly shortening year by year. However, as the recent payback time value is not sufficiently known to the public, even now it is sometimes incorrectly stated that the payback time of photovoltaic power generation system is more than 10 years based on old data of over ten years ago.

The most recent EPT data published in our country (in the case of residential roof-top installations) states that EPT of polycrystalline silicon is 1.5 year, for amorphous silicon is 1.1 year, for compound thin film (CIS) is 0.9 year and CO2PTs are 2.4, 1.5 and 1.4 year respectively[2]. Please note, however, that with crystalline silicon, the above calculation was done with the new silicon manufacturing method presently being developed, and if calculated with the current method, the EPT is 2.0 years and CO2PT is 2.7 years (Fig.2). Similar figures have been reported in Europe and the US. As the life time of solar cells is considered to be at least 20 to 30 years, both the EPT and CO2PT based on the most recent data is sufficiently short, and a photovoltaic system is a good power generating system from the view point of LCA.

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Input energy for production and payback times of photovoltaic power generation systems
Assumptions:
PolySi (1991): ground installation 1 MW, production capacity = unknown, operational energy = 1 %
Others: residential 3 kW system, production capacity = 100 MW/year, operational energy = neglected
Current data of poly-Si is recalculated based on the document [2]

Toward a sustainable society

In the "New Energy Innovation Plan", which is one of the 4 pillars of the "New National Energy Strategy" made in May 2006 as the basic policy of the energy measures of our country, it is clearly stated that the cost of photovoltaic power generation will aim for a reduction to the level of conventional thermal power generation by 2030. In the long-term road map of research and development concerning photovoltaic power generation (PV2030) made in 2004, it is assumed that by 2030 the cumulative installation will be 100 GW (100 million kW) which will cover 10 % of the total electricity need.

In order to achieve these installation goals, it is indispensable to do research and development for further efficiency improvement of solar cells, cost reduction, and introduction of new system concepts that would allow expansion of application areas and installation sites. It is also important that, with the assessment of environmental effects with LCA introduced here, the latest information is constantly provided by continually investigating the results of new production technology introduction based on advancement in research and development and from expansion of production scale, in order to gain public understanding of photovoltaic power generation as a new energy technology.

Research Center for Photovoltaics
Koichi Sakuta


References

[1]  Uchiyama, et al. Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry Research Report Y90015 (1991.1.11)
[2]  NEDO Report, "Research Study of Photovoltaic Generation Evaluation", Association of photovoltaic generation technology research, (2001.3)


 back